Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 866
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 194 244 284 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 304 344 394 794 866 template Next
  • #4396
    Originally posted by Haleef View Post
    yeah my friends were onboard.. It was an A330 the flight was to Malaysia and there was a technical fault and they landed and the passengers went again in an A340
    Hydraulic failure on 4R-ALD

    Colombo (Sri Lanka) - A plane airline of Sri Lanka SriLankan Airlines was forced to turn around and rest on the Colombo (Sri Lanka) due to hydraulic problems International Airport after an hour's flight . The plane, an Airbus 340-300, flight UL314, which was to make the connection between the Colombo Bandaranaike International Airport and Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) International Airport with 296 passengers on board, departed to 8:20 PM local with 45 minutes behind the scheduled time, and was flying for about an hour when pilots were alerted to a problem with the hydraulics of the machine. They then decided to turn back to rest in Colombo. Aircraft rested without further incident, amid the emergency vehicles and there are no injuries. The passengers were deplaned and transferred to the terminal until the airline can carry them out. The company technicians will examine the device to determine the causes of the failure.

    source : http://www.crash-aerien.aero/www/new....php?id=437167

    Comment

    • #4397
      Originally posted by Serendib View Post
      Hydraulic failure on 4R-ALD

      Colombo (Sri Lanka) - A plane airline of Sri Lanka SriLankan Airlines was forced to turn around and rest on the Colombo (Sri Lanka) due to hydraulic problems International Airport after an hour's flight . The plane, an Airbus 340-300, flight UL314, which was to make the connection between the Colombo Bandaranaike International Airport and Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) International Airport with 296 passengers on board, departed to 8:20 PM local with 45 minutes behind the scheduled time, and was flying for about an hour when pilots were alerted to a problem with the hydraulics of the machine. They then decided to turn back to rest in Colombo. Aircraft rested without further incident, amid the emergency vehicles and there are no injuries. The passengers were deplaned and transferred to the terminal until the airline can carry them out. The company technicians will examine the device to determine the causes of the failure.

      source : http://www.crash-aerien.aero/www/new....php?id=437167
      Article says ALD & then A340-300... looks like a typo
      ​Umedha Hettigoda ®

      https://banners-my.flightradar24.com/umedhah.png

      Comment

      • #4398
        Originally posted by umedhah View Post
        Article says ALD & then A340-300... looks like a typo
        Please see http://www.flightradar24.com/data/ai...r-ald/#422727b

        Technical failure on 4R-ALD. Later passengers sent to KUL by 4R-ADC.

        Comment

        • #4399
          Originally posted by Haleef View Post
          yeah my friends were onboard.. It was an A330 the flight was to Malaysia and there was a technical fault and they landed and the passengers went again in an A340
          geeez. Malaysia and aviation incidents

          Comment

          • #4400
            Originally posted by Serendib View Post
            Please see http://www.flightradar24.com/data/ai...r-ald/#422727b

            Technical failure on 4R-ALD. Later passengers sent to KUL by 4R-ADC.
            Thanks Serendib for the update. Yeah 4R-ALD was the aircraft which had the technical issue yesterday when it operate UL314. But the issue on this aircraft had been sorted out yesterday and it was operating UL217 to Doha and today is flying to Moscow as UL533.

            Comment

            • #4401
              Originally posted by Prasad View Post
              Any News if and when CMB MEL flights will begin ???
              Why do you think Melbourne route is important for SriLankan ? I thought SriLankan better strengthen their regional network as they are making losses in long-haul market.

              Comment

              • #4402
                Originally posted by banuthev View Post
                Why do you think Melbourne route is important for SriLankan ? I thought SriLankan better strengthen their regional network as they are making losses in long-haul market.
                Melbourne has the most Sri Lankan population outside Sri Lankan Waters !!! Also Melbourne is 2014 is worlds most liveable city

                Comment

                • #4403
                  Originally posted by Prasad View Post
                  Melbourne has the most Sri Lankan population outside Sri Lankan Waters !!! Also Melbourne is 2014 is worlds most liveable city
                  City quality of life indices - Wikipedia
                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_most_liveable_cities


                  There are few other Australian Cities too among this survey.

                  Comment

                  • #4404
                    Originally posted by banuthev View Post
                    Why do you think Melbourne route is important for SriLankan ? I thought SriLankan better strengthen their regional network as they are making losses in long-haul market.
                    I think increase more Rome , Frankfurt flights .An additional European flight like Colombo-Milano-Munich also an option for me.

                    Comment

                    • #4405
                      Originally posted by Srilankan1 View Post
                      I think increase more Rome , Frankfurt flights .An additional European flight like Colombo-Milano-Munich also an option for me.
                      They should start Milan! We had more pax n cargo!

                      Comment

                      • #4406
                        Originally posted by AirCeylon View Post
                        They should start Milan! We had more pax n cargo!
                        That's why I would like to see a round flight combined with Munich. this may bring pax from Vienna , Prague , Budapest additionally to German tourists.

                        Comment

                        • #4407
                          Originally posted by AirCeylon View Post
                          They should start Milan! We had more pax n cargo!
                          During the christmas time which is the coming months... People visit rome.... So i think... During this time air lanka should increase more flights from sri lanka to rome.... They shold think about it.... More than tourists visit sri lanka... They prefer visit rome in christmas time.... So air lanka can have a outstanding income through this...

                          Comment

                          • #4408
                            Originally posted by ULXWB View Post
                            During the christmas time which is the coming months... People visit rome.... So i think... During this time air lanka should increase more flights from sri lanka to rome.... They shold think about it.... More than tourists visit sri lanka... They prefer visit rome in christmas time.... So air lanka can have a outstanding income through this...
                            It appears to be SriLankan going to increase the frequency on Frankfurt (from 4 to 5 weekly) and Moscow (from 2 to 3 weekly) effective Winter 2014. Aircraft to Rome going to be upgraded from A332/A343 to all three weekly A343. They better focus on profitable routes. What do you think ?

                            Comment

                            • #4409
                              Originally posted by Srilankan1 View Post
                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's...iveable_cities

                              There are few other Australian Cities too among this survey.
                              It's a strength that will only get stronger once UL have their foot on Australian airports. Look at Ek they have flight to NZ via Mel thus carrying full flights from DBX and expanding the network at the same time. This is just my opinion n Australia is the only continent that we still do not operate into. UL ready flys into Europe so why not help European tourist transit in CMB before moving to Aus .. This may increase pax loads instead of flying extra long direct flights.

                              Comment

                              • #4410
                                Originally posted by Prasad View Post
                                It's a strength that will only get stronger once UL have their foot on Australian airports. Look at Ek they have flight to NZ via Mel thus carrying full flights from DBX and expanding the network at the same time. This is just my opinion n Australia is the only continent that we still do not operate into. UL ready flys into Europe so why not help European tourist transit in CMB before moving to Aus .. This may increase pax loads instead of flying extra long direct flights.
                                I have nothing against UL start flights to Australia. but do they have enough Aircrafts to cover up? I believe not.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 194 244 284 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 304 344 394 794 866 template Next
                                Working...
                                X