Originally posted by Srilankan1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sri Lanka Aviation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by TheF15Ace View PostAt the current pace of cutting off revenue streams there might not be a UL for much longer. You notice how they keep getting rid of aircraft and axing routes but not a single politically appointed muppet has been shown the door yet. Corruption from the previous regime and lack of backbone from the current one will continue to sink this airline.
On another front Cramer and his little band of rebels continue to give management the finger:
Only in Sri Lanka would idiots like this not be terminated immediately. I'm just happy that some FAs are atleast trying to kick these fools out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi View Postyeah so what? Look, the current UL management spokesman is here. But still SO WHAT, he can't understand logic. How can you be profitable by cutting down profitable routes with 90%+ demand on each flight (do you have an idea how well routes like CGK, LHE, DAC and BAH are performing?). Still so what ? you might not understand plain english
your demagogue and his merry men lost the election and the management now get used it it...he is not coming back
Comment
-
Originally posted by Speedbird View PostUL/MJ is losing money every day overall none of the routes are profitable because as whole UL and MJ are losing money
your demagogue and his merry men lost the election and the management now get used it it...he is not coming back
Comment
-
Originally posted by Speedbird View Postcouldn't have said better?Last edited by dilushasg-bdavi; 14-08-2016, 05:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Speedbird View PostUL/MJ is losing money every day overall none of the routes are profitable because as whole UL and MJ are losing money
your demagogue and his merry men lost the election and the management now get used it it...he is not coming back
If you actually worked for the airline you'd see there has been no change.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi View PostHey SO WHAT? it's all to make UL PROFITABLE......right???It was actually funny last year after the elections, to see alot of people who's only qualification was having their name on a politician's list, do their work. Heads bowed mouths shut. Now they are back to going around like they own place. The only change that has been made in this department is their numbers have actually grown. I'm sure it's all part of the governments plan to stop the bleeding as Speedbird keeps saying
Comment
-
Originally posted by dilushasg-bdavi View Postyeah so what? Look, the current UL management spokesman is here. But still SO WHAT, he can't understand logic. How can you be profitable by cutting down profitable routes with 90%+ demand on each flight (do you have an idea how well routes like CGK, LHE, DAC and BAH are performing?). Still so what ? you might not understand plain english
Comment
-
Originally posted by lordvader View PostThe flights may be full but they may not neccessarily be profitable if yields are low. That said UL needs to find a way to deal with this - for example, starting a subsidiary with lower costs to operate the flights on behalf of UL. Of course this thinking would require someone with aviation managerial experience and a backbone to be running the company like the CEO EK installed.
If SL Gov is really want to make UL to be profitable they need to appoint experienced management in aviation and have to get rid of cronies/thieves from the airline.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lordvader View PostThe flights may be full but they may not neccessarily be profitable if yields are low. That said UL needs to find a way to deal with this - for example, starting a subsidiary with lower costs to operate the flights on behalf of UL. Of course this thinking would require someone with aviation managerial experience and a backbone to be running the company like the CEO EK installed.
Comment
Comment