Originally posted by Haleef
View Post
Why UL should be getting A339neo instead of A333? Isn't that A333 is cheaper than A339neo and also A333 is just fit for the current UL network. I think the difference on seating capacity is around 30 seats on UL style J/Y config. UL is already flying A333 to short haul routes like TRV, BLR, COK etc..
Comment