Originally posted by lordvader
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sri Lanka Aviation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
SriLankan Airlines Network - November 2017
03 Weekly – Kolkata, Kunming, Lahore,
04 Weekly – Beijing, Coimbatore, Dammam, Gan, Shanghai, Seychelles, Tokyo, Visakhapatnam
05 Weekly – Hong Kong, Hyderabad,
06 Weekly – Muscat, Jeddah
07 Weekly – Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Dhaka, Doha, Dubai, Guangzhou, Jakarta, Kuwait, Madurai, Melbourne, Riyadh, Trivandrum,
09 Weekly – London,
11 Weekly – Delhi,
13 Weekly – Kochi,
14 Weekly – Bengaluru, Kuala Lumpur, Mumbai, Trichy,
21 Weekly – Bangkok, Singapore,
26 Weekly – Male’,
30 Weekly – Chennai,
SriLankan Airlines Current Fleet
A320-200 - 6 (ABL, MRE, ABM, ABN, ABO, ABP)
A320-25N - 2 (ANA, ANB)
A321-200 - 3 (ABQ, ABR, MRD)
A321-25N - 2 (ANC, AND)
A330-200 - 6 (ALA, ALB, ALC, ALD, ALH, ALJ)
A330-300 - 7 (ALL, ALM, ALN, ALO, ALP, ALQ, ALR)
SriLankan Airlines Flight Schedules : http://www.airsrilanka.org/flightinf...an-nov2017.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostSriLankan Airlines Network - November 2017
03 Weekly – Kolkata, Kunming, Lahore,
04 Weekly – Beijing, Coimbatore, Dammam, Gan, Shanghai, Seychelles, Tokyo, Visakhapatnam
05 Weekly – Hong Kong, Hyderabad,
06 Weekly – Muscat, Jeddah
07 Weekly – Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Dhaka, Doha, Dubai, Guangzhou, Jakarta, Kuwait, Madurai, Melbourne, Riyadh, Trivandrum,
09 Weekly – London,
11 Weekly – Delhi,
13 Weekly – Kochi,
14 Weekly – Bengaluru, Kuala Lumpur, Mumbai, Trichy,
21 Weekly – Bangkok, Singapore,
26 Weekly – Male’,
30 Weekly – Chennai,
SriLankan Airlines Current Fleet
A320-200 - 6 (ABL, MRE, ABM, ABN, ABO, ABP)
A320-25N - 2 (ANA, ANB)
A321-200 - 3 (ABQ, ABR, MRD)
A321-25N - 2 (ANC, AND)
A330-200 - 6 (ALA, ALB, ALC, ALD, ALH, ALJ)
A330-300 - 7 (ALL, ALM, ALN, ALO, ALP, ALQ, ALR)
SriLankan Airlines Flight Schedules : http://www.airsrilanka.org/flightinf...an-nov2017.pdf
Why can't it be reduced to 2 daily flights using A350s?(if SL had some)
Comment
-
Although not directly relevant on this thread, QR is to buy a 10% stake of CX. Looks like they are after much bigger fish than UL!!
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-41882322
Comment
-
UL605 MEL to CMB rejected landing in CMB, landed 2nd time.https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...4r-ala#f7177c2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ejanson65 View PostPerhaps Qatar is fully aware of how 'Business' is done in Sri Lanka and will do the smart thing and stay well clear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Serendib View PostThe cabinet spokesman Minister Rajitha Senaratne recently revealed that the Mihin Lanka Airlines flight will be handed over to the Qatar airline. Attending the cabinet decision making media briefing. Minister Abeywardena said that Mihin Lanka Airlines license was already open and that discussions were held with the airline in Qatar on the President's visit. Meanwhile, Senaratne said that the Cabinet decided to appoint Mihin Lanka to investigate the causes of losses. government is also considering selling its operator’s licenses and certificates to interested third parties looking to establish a new Sri Lanka-based carrier.
This has been tried how many times already? Last time Akbar came and basically laughed in their faces.
There is no way to make any of this profitable - makes no difference what they do or who is in charge. The 12 year leases at above market rates with no termination clause have seen to that.
I can sense the desperation from 4500 miles away!Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business
Comment
-
Originally posted by Serendib View PostThe cabinet spokesman Minister Rajitha Senaratne recently revealed that the Mihin Lanka Airlines flight will be handed over to the Qatar airline. Attending the cabinet decision making media briefing. Minister Abeywardena said that Mihin Lanka Airlines license was already open and that discussions were held with the airline in Qatar on the President's visit. Meanwhile, Senaratne said that the Cabinet decided to appoint Mihin Lanka to investigate the causes of losses. government is also considering selling its operator’s licenses and certificates to interested third parties looking to establish a new Sri Lanka-based carrier.
Comment
-
Hi did you guys saw an article on ST
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/171105/bus...on-266759.html
.. Author argues that UL should not have been considered daily flights to MEL
You guys agree???
according to writer UL decision to fly MEL is not wise...do you agree? he is very much worried on how to fill flight seats daily (?)... he says not all lankan will fly daily.. non-sri lankans also would not use UL flight...bla bla...
If this is correct.. then
HOW UL can fly LONDON twice??? Hilarious hahh..
I think these pandithayos should keep thier mouth shut...
Comment
-
Originally posted by vishwa View PostHi did you guys saw an article on ST
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/171105/bus...on-266759.html
.. Author argues that UL should not have been considered daily flights to MEL
You guys agree???
according to writer UL decision to fly MEL is not wise...do you agree? he is very much worried on how to fill flight seats daily (?)... he says not all lankan will fly daily.. non-sri lankans also would not use UL flight...bla bla...
If this is correct.. then
HOW UL can fly LONDON twice??? Hilarious hahh..
I think these pandithayos should keep thier mouth shut...
Comment
-
Originally posted by vishwa View PostHi did you guys saw an article on ST
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/171105/bus...on-266759.html
.. Author argues that UL should not have been considered daily flights to MEL
You guys agree???
according to writer UL decision to fly MEL is not wise...do you agree? he is very much worried on how to fill flight seats daily (?)... he says not all lankan will fly daily.. non-sri lankans also would not use UL flight...bla bla...
If this is correct.. then
HOW UL can fly LONDON twice??? Hilarious hahh..
I think these pandithayos should keep thier mouth shut...
Comment
-
Originally posted by vishwa View PostHi did you guys saw an article on ST
http://www.sundaytimes.lk/171105/bus...on-266759.html
.. Author argues that UL should not have been considered daily flights to MEL
You guys agree???
according to writer UL decision to fly MEL is not wise...do you agree? he is very much worried on how to fill flight seats daily (?)... he says not all lankan will fly daily.. non-sri lankans also would not use UL flight...bla bla...
If this is correct.. then
HOW UL can fly LONDON twice??? Hilarious hahh..
I think these pandithayos should keep thier mouth shut...
This is going to be a massive money loser (could easily be $100,00 flight) - especially with the expensive leases of the A333.
People still seem to be making the following assumptions:-
-UL is run like a Business.
-People at UL know what they are doing.
Both assumptions are incorrect.
The only thing that's 100% certain is more massive losses for the taxpayersAlways fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business
Comment
Comment