Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sri Lanka Aviation

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 871
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 371 771 821 861 868 869 870 871 template Next
  • #13051
    Originally posted by MAW2000 View Post

    Agree WizzWaveSien​,

    If UL could do this as a short term fleet upgrade, and long term fleet renewal, UL can start more flights...UL should avoid A320Ns instead they should go with A321Ns since they can use for high density medium haul routes in off-seasons.
    My suggestion as follows,

    I guess there are no more slots available between Australia and Colombo, if there are UL can increase frequency between SYD, and PER.
    Around the year,
    DEL, BOM, BLR, HYD, MAA, CCU, AMD, COK, TRV
    DAC, KTM, KHI, LHE, MLE, GAN
    MEL, SYD, PER
    LHR, FRA, CDG, MXP, AMS, OTP
    NRT, ICN
    BKK, KUL, SIN, CGK, HAN or SGN​

    Currently there is a surge of Sri Lankans' in Romania, so, need to find the possibility and slots between Bucharest​ (OTP) Romania...
    and missed routes AMS Amsterdam, MXP Milan Malpensa....
    A321N can operate OTP-CMB routes without a problem, same goes with CMB-MXP, CMB-FCO and maybe even CMB-ZRH? etc.. UL could pick up A321NX/NYs to begin routes to those destinations, UL could also use the A321 XLR or LR or NEO for that matter on long haul routes where much demand is not needed for a widebody aircraft, such as PVG-CMB, PEK-CMB, ICN-CMB etc.

    A321Ns can be used as a replacement for A320's that UL has..
    Sien (KR/SL/US)
    ​

    Comment

    • #13052
      Originally posted by MAW2000 View Post

      Agree WizzWaveSien​,

      If UL could do this as a short term fleet upgrade, and long term fleet renewal, UL can start more flights...UL should avoid A320Ns instead they should go with A321Ns since they can use for high density medium haul routes in off-seasons.
      My suggestion as follows,

      I guess there are no more slots available between Australia and Colombo, if there are UL can increase frequency between SYD, and PER.
      Around the year,
      DEL, BOM, BLR, HYD, MAA, CCU, AMD, COK, TRV
      DAC, KTM, KHI, LHE, MLE, GAN
      MEL, SYD, PER
      LHR, FRA, CDG, MXP, AMS, OTP
      NRT, ICN
      BKK, KUL, SIN, CGK, HAN or SGN​

      Currently there is a surge of Sri Lankans' in Romania, so, need to find the possibility and slots between Bucharest​ (OTP) Romania...
      and missed routes AMS Amsterdam, MXP Milan Malpensa....
      To run above routes efficiently, UL should have at least 35 aircrafts and at least 15 of them has to be long range widebodies.

      Comment

      • #13053
        Originally posted by WizzWaveSien View Post

        A321N can operate OTP-CMB routes without a problem, same goes with CMB-MXP, CMB-FCO and maybe even CMB-ZRH? etc.. UL could pick up A321NX/NYs to begin routes to those destinations, UL could also use the A321 XLR or LR or NEO for that matter on long haul routes where much demand is not needed for a widebody aircraft, such as PVG-CMB, PEK-CMB, ICN-CMB etc.

        A321Ns can be used as a replacement for A320's that UL has..
        UL may keep around some 320s considering they do certain routes such as GAN.
        considering that the A321N is more fuel efficient than the A332, I guess it would be viable to go that way,(correct if i'm wrong)
        as of A321NX, which would be better- the -251NX, the -252NX or -271NX or the -272NX

        also, any updates on the following?
        AND
        ANE
        ANF
        ALH
        ALM
        ALN

        Comment

        • #13054
          Originally posted by n863gt View Post

          UL may keep around some 320s considering they do certain routes such as GAN.
          considering that the A321N is more fuel efficient than the A332, I guess it would be viable to go that way,(correct if i'm wrong)
          as of A321NX, which would be better- the -251NX, the -252NX or -271NX or the -272NX

          also, any updates on the following?
          AND
          ANE
          ANF
          ALH
          ALM
          ALN
          Doesn't know about ALM, ALN is on weekly maintenance, as I heard, one A21N is near the hangar, one was at Apron Echo.

          A321-27#N# is bit dangerous, Better to go with CFMI Leap 1A engine option, and also Better to consider LR version and also Business class configuration with 1-1 full lie flat seats just like Iberia's A321XLR cabins or Air Astana's A321N cabins. It will help UL to maintain long haul routes even in off-seasons instead of A332s, and also to cater short-haul routes instead of using dated A320ceos..

          Comment

          Previous 1 371 771 821 861 868 869 870 871 template Next
          Working...
          X