Originally posted by lordvader
View Post
Chandrasena said "It may be cheaper for us to keep the aircraft on the ground than operating and making a higher loss because of the fuel price. "In that scenario we may decide to ground one or two aircraft so that we will reduce loss-making routes and deploy available capacity on opportunistic markets".
I think UL should be concentrating now on replacing all A343s from the fleet rather than taking delivery of additional aircraft and ground them because of the fuel price. Also Introducing Boeing in their fleet will cost more money e.g. training ... It will be better if UL order both A332 & A333 to replace A343s. Correct me if I am wrong ?
Comment