as i have heard the new 330 have no center fuel tank and the pay load which can carry is lower. it easily get restricted and can't get full revenue from it as i hope. Don't know why they decided to get this kind of aircraft instead of a one with which can get maximum usage.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sri Lanka Aviation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by randeer View Postas i have heard the new 330 have no center fuel tank and the pay load which can carry is lower. it easily get restricted and can't get full revenue from it as i hope. Don't know why they decided to get this kind of aircraft instead of a one with which can get maximum usage.
Comment
-
Mihin Lanka is earning profits
Comment
-
Originally posted by MalaysiaMustafa View PostNice Pic. By the way MJ 4R-MRD is not in service for past two days. Any reason?
Btw Air India has increased the MAA-CMB flights from 6 to 7 weekly. Any possibilities Jet Airways resuming flights to Colombo from Chennai?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Serendib View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by randeer View Postas i have heard the new 330 have no center fuel tank and the pay load which can carry is lower. it easily get restricted and can't get full revenue from it as i hope. Don't know why they decided to get this kind of aircraft instead of a one with which can get maximum usage.
When I flew this route it was normally planned as a re-dispatched flight.
Flight was filed as CMB-LHR. Paper Flightplan was CMB-FRA with an extra section from waypoint SUBES to LHR.
If we had enough fuel at SUBES we would continue on to London. Otherwise we would need to divert to Frankfurt.
Re-dispatch saved about 1200kg in contingency fuel - allowing a higher payload.
This flight was frequently too heavy to re-dispatch eastbound (it would be above max landing weight if it diverted to Bangalore).Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business
Comment
-
SriLankan Airlines and the Airline's Aircraft Technicians' Association (SAATA) signed a collective agreement recently for a period of three years. The agreement recognizes the importance of enhancing productivity when the national carrier is stepping into a new era of world travel with its extensive wide-body fleet renewal programme, initiated last month. At a time when the Airline is aiming at improving its operational efficiencies, services and product offering to provide a more luxurious travel experience to its passengers, the Agreement recognizes the importance of enhancing productivity and appreciates the efforts extended by Aircraft Technicians towards taking the Airline forward. SriLankan Airlines perceives this agreement as a symbolic gesture that signifies the unwavering bond that the Management has forged with its workforce which will progressively contribute to the company's future expansion plans and while motivating all employee groups to work towards the Management's slogan, " Working together and winning together."
http://www.colombopage.com/archive_1...16032853CH.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by umedhah View PostLooks like this is a seasonal flight?
Pic : https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.n...4633083368a04e
Comment
-
Originally posted by banuthev View PostYeah umedha, looks like it's a seasonal flight planned to operate on 15/11, 25,11, 5/12, 16/12, 26/12, 06/1, 16/1, 28/1, 06/2, 17/2, 27/2, 10/3, 20/3. These flights are operating on Tuesday and Fridays departing from Demodedovo 21:30 and landing in Colombo 06:00 (UN9541) on Wednesdays and Saturdays. The Return flights are departing on Wednesdays and Saturdays from Colombo 07:30 (UN9542) and landing in Demodedovo 16:40 on the same day. I heard last winter Transaero flew some charters to Colombo as well as Mattala.
Pic : https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.n...4633083368a04e
Comment
-
Originally posted by ejanson65 View PostEven the A340 is payload restricted to London in the winter months. This flight can be as long as 12 hours.
When I flew this route it was normally planned as a re-dispatched flight.
Flight was filed as CMB-LHR. Paper Flightplan was CMB-FRA with an extra section from waypoint SUBES to LHR.
If we had enough fuel at SUBES we would continue on to London. Otherwise we would need to divert to Frankfurt.
Re-dispatch saved about 1200kg in contingency fuel - allowing a higher payload.
This flight was frequently too heavy to re-dispatch eastbound (it would be above max landing weight if it diverted to Bangalore).
Comment
-
Originally posted by randeer View PostSo this 4R-ALL is not a bad choice from the management?
I have operated A330-200 CMB-LHR-CMB. This was always payload restricted and cargo was continually left behind. UL lost a lot of cargo contracts in London as a result. London used to be A340 only.Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find this business
Comment
Comment